- Empowering bumiputra human capital;
- Strengthening bumiputra equity ownership in the corporate sector;
- Strengthening bumiputra non-financial asset ownership;
- Improving bumiputra entrepreneurship and business; and
- Strengthening the services delivery ecosystem.
But I have some issues with the plans for the thrusters. They seem rushed. I don't believe they would bring a quantum leap in the Malay's economic power; I believe the think-tank could think and come up with something better from their tank.
Before we go on, there is something that we must be clear in our head. I am talking about the Malay economic power (in saying Malay, I am including the Bumiputeras as well) AS A SOCIETY, rather than individual or a segment, a caste. When a policy benefits a few individuals and they get extremely rich from it, it does not translate into Malay Economic power unless they give back much more to the Malay community. We must look at the society as a whole, from the poorest to the richest.
In that regard, we must also understand the demographic of the Malay society that while it is true that past policies have created a larger pool of middle class Malays, the society is still dominated by largely the poor, both in terms of financial education as well as the financial itself. This society is by and large, poor and heavily subsidized.
Lets start with the ASB2; RM10 billion of it. And here are my issues:
- ASB is attractive only because it is a superhigh-return savings scheme. The guarantee of the capital makes it risk free (better than bank deposit (?), maybe, because PIDM has a limit on the guaranteed savings amount) and it gives an equity-based return (way higher than the deposit rate of around 3% per annum).
- That would just make people switch their long term fixed deposit into ASB (those poorer ones who needs to withdraw cash regularly cannot benefit because you need to lock the amount in ASB to fully enjoy the yearly dividend). Who has one year long term deposits? Certainly not the poorer Malays nor even the middle class Malays. It will definitely benefit the richer Malays, those who have maxed out their ASB1.
- So it looked like this plan would benefit the already rich Malays first. But their number is not that big.
- In my opinion, this ASB does nothing to promote active economic management of the Malays. Instead it is training the Malays to be passive owners of equity. The term "reign but does not rule" comes to mind. I don't believe that passive ownership of equity would make the society any better at creating and managing economic power - that one comes from owning and operating businesses.
- ASB does not directly and significantly help the Malay society in owning and operating businesses. The moneys in ASB would have to be placed in secure investments so that the managers could manage the risk and give the expected return. Amongst others, they would be invested in companies owned by non-Malays (because they still dominate the real economy, they own the businesses) and when this happens, the capital flows to enhance the economic power of the original owner. They would use the much needed cash to build more businesses and when it has grown big enough, they would then go for listing again - and the cycle continues.
- So, I ask myself, does the Malay businesses really benefit from the ASB? Does the Malay society as a whole benefits from ASB? Do Malay entrepreneurs benefit from ASB? I have great difficulty to say a resounding yes. Menang sorak, kampung tergadai.
Salam.
Part 2
Okay, in my last write-up I laid down my issues on the ASB2. Today I wanna look at the re-skilling of Malay graduates through GiatMARA and the likes.
Although I still maintain that this is an 80's ideas, I will admit that it is one of the most brilliant and most relevant scheme to empower the Malays.
You see, while the dreams and ideas planted in the head of the Malays (mostly self planted too) is that the new Malay economy mean cushy management job, requiring them to merely point fingers for a fat paycheck. That being a Malay entitles them to such livelihood.
But in reality,
...if you and your attitude suck, you will not get a job (Unemployed Graduates)
...unforeseen predicaments and challenges will bear its might on you (Nena; VSS)
This GiatMARA and the likes might not be glamorous but it is REAL. It deals and prepares the young Malays about the real life of working for yourself or your employer. It creates the culture of having to get your hands dirty to get the job done. What the Malay Economy needs are good, hardworking Malays with the right attitude and GiatMARA is the perfect place to get this done.
The issue, as it has always been before is in the implementation. Just as much as MARA needs to train the young Malays in the ethics of doing things, MARA and its staff also needs to be improved.An improved MARA, a more selfless, efficient and facilitative could bring a much better change in the Malay young. Don't get me wrong - I never say that they are not genuinely caring Malays in MARA; They are. But I believe that the people in MARA needs to be appreciated more, be reinvigorated and motivated. They must be made to know that the Malays appreciate them and that they play a very significant part in making sure the grand plan works.
But MARA is only one part of the equation, the other part is us. We must take part in the process of creating the right culture. Those Malays who has been successful MUST give back to the society by getting involved in helping MARA groom the new Malays. MARA should also make it easier for people to volunteer to help its cause. We need to create this culture of giving back (in terms of time and effort) to the society that have given and fought so much for us. Rather than sit around and bitch about how bad the quality of graduates now, we must reach out and make the changes to the status quo. Otherwise, we are also part of the problem, slowly destroying the agenda.
No comments:
Post a Comment